sully
honorary peso (chingador*)
Posts: 13,045
|
Post by sully on Dec 10, 2010 11:08:35 GMT -5
I'm not saying I agree with questioning their move. But, it's the medjias job to write those types of pieces.
I think our hand was forced too. I'm just hoping we didn't ride adrenaline of a deal and offer more than we should have.
|
|
fischer
honorary peso (chingador*)
Posts: 16,271
|
Post by fischer on Dec 10, 2010 11:12:43 GMT -5
yeah, I know its their job. I just wish they were held accountable for being really bad at it.
Reporting facts, or even rumors is one thing. But when its your job to provide analysis, x's and o's, or strategy you should be held accountable just like the people you are analyzing.
I understand mistakes happen, you will be wrong some of the time. But when its constant back and forth and you're always wrong you should be held accountable.
|
|
|
|
Post by P. Marf on Dec 10, 2010 11:25:09 GMT -5
With the use of social media and blogs, accountability has disappeared in the media. Its all about getting the news out first, breaking it. Whoever gets a rumor on twitter up first wins. Before the time of the internet news had time to work itself out for an entire day before a reporter could put it in the newspaper. They were held accountable cause that is what everyone relied on for their news. Now they can just get on Twitter from their I-Phong and report on something that they might have heard from someone who may have an inside person.
|
|
fischer
honorary peso (chingador*)
Posts: 16,271
|
Post by fischer on Dec 10, 2010 11:27:38 GMT -5
With the use of social media and blogs, accountability has disappeared in the media. Its all about getting the news out first, breaking it. Whoever gets a rumor on twitter up first wins. Before the time of the internet news had time to work itself out for an entire day before a reporter could put it in the newspaper. They were held accountable cause that is what everyone relied on for their news. Now they can just get on Twitter from their I-Phong and report on something that they might have heard from someone who may have an inside person. Thank you Gordon Keith, Junior Miller, and George Dunham. |
|
|
|
Post by P. Marf on Dec 10, 2010 11:30:04 GMT -5
Did I need to have a works cited? I just figured the majority of the stuff we say on here is regurgitated from ESPN, the Ticket, or of the internet.
|
|
sully
honorary peso (chingador*)
Posts: 13,045
|
Post by sully on Dec 10, 2010 11:38:32 GMT -5
All of my stuff is original...
|
|
|
|
Post by P. Marf on Dec 10, 2010 11:49:27 GMT -5
Ha.
|
|
fischer
honorary peso (chingador*)
Posts: 16,271
|
Post by fischer on Dec 10, 2010 13:14:35 GMT -5
All NONE of my stuff is original... FIFY No need for a works cited Craig, although usually a "They were talking about this on the Ticket" or "I agree with what Gordo said about..." isn't too hard to accomplish. That was nearly word for word. |
|
|
|
Post by P. Marf on Dec 10, 2010 13:32:39 GMT -5
You can't prove that.
|
|
fischer
honorary peso (chingador*)
Posts: 16,271
|
Post by fischer on Dec 10, 2010 13:53:06 GMT -5
haha, you are correct. Don't want to, either.
|
|
|
|
Post by P. Marf on Dec 10, 2010 14:37:28 GMT -5
I think that is going to be my new argument to everything. "Prove it." Either the other person will give up and not want to go through the trouble, or they will have to do research and recording that in turn I really don't care much about anyways.
|
|
fischer
honorary peso (chingador*)
Posts: 16,271
|
Post by fischer on Dec 10, 2010 14:42:49 GMT -5
A very effective strategy if its a case of radio.
In this case, it would be very hard to prove you wrong.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Real Doyle on Dec 10, 2010 17:00:06 GMT -5
I have a 13" penis.
|
|
sully
honorary peso (chingador*)
Posts: 13,045
|
Post by sully on Dec 10, 2010 17:09:01 GMT -5
Good Doyle. Very nice.
|
|
|
|
Post by The River Assassin on Dec 10, 2010 17:34:30 GMT -5
I can vouch for Doyle on that...wait, I've said too much
|
|
