Post by fischer on Dec 10, 2010 14:16:19 GMT -5
I've been doing some thinking on this subject, and I have come to a realization that sports fans can be divided into two different groups.
Fan #1:
This fan loves his team. He goes to games, watches them on t.v., reads articles about them, listens to radio shows, etc. This fan tends to feel like he is part of the team, that he knows the ins and outs of the team because he follows them so closely. This fan is very passionate. On the other side of that coin, though, this fan begins to feel like an "expert" in regards to his team. Often, this fan aligns himself with members of the media whom he perceives as an expert. If something bad happens to his team, Fan #1 often looks for guidance from media "experts". In turn, this fan is very wishy washy on opinions, changes his mind often, and is up and down all the time. His fatal flaw is that he has no real identity as a fan, and any talking head can sway his opinion.
Fan#2:
This fan also loves his team. He goes to games, watches them on t.v., reads articles, listens to radio shows about them, etc. Fan #2 lives and dies by his team just as Fan #1 does. He feels like he is part of the team, just as Fan #1 does. But, whereas fan #1 tends to align himself with the media and their "experts", fan #2 is very skeptical of media. He thinks most media members are wrong. Sometimes fan #2 even thinks the media is against his team. Fan #2 tends to give a little more leeway to coaches. He is slower to question moves, always falling back on "they're the professionals, they know what's going on, and I trust them."
Fan #2 is more headstrong in his beliefs, his mind doesn't often change, and he tends to have more thoughts that are self reliant. That is not to say he is not ever wrong. His fatal flaw is that he is too reliant on the powers that be, and sometimes the powers that be are wrong.
Our small sample of posters in this forum represent both types of sports fans.
I think there are some gray areas and I think sometimes you may be fan #1 of one team and #2 of another.
But for the most part, I feel like you are one or the other.
What do y'all think?
Fan #1:
This fan loves his team. He goes to games, watches them on t.v., reads articles about them, listens to radio shows, etc. This fan tends to feel like he is part of the team, that he knows the ins and outs of the team because he follows them so closely. This fan is very passionate. On the other side of that coin, though, this fan begins to feel like an "expert" in regards to his team. Often, this fan aligns himself with members of the media whom he perceives as an expert. If something bad happens to his team, Fan #1 often looks for guidance from media "experts". In turn, this fan is very wishy washy on opinions, changes his mind often, and is up and down all the time. His fatal flaw is that he has no real identity as a fan, and any talking head can sway his opinion.
Fan#2:
This fan also loves his team. He goes to games, watches them on t.v., reads articles, listens to radio shows about them, etc. Fan #2 lives and dies by his team just as Fan #1 does. He feels like he is part of the team, just as Fan #1 does. But, whereas fan #1 tends to align himself with the media and their "experts", fan #2 is very skeptical of media. He thinks most media members are wrong. Sometimes fan #2 even thinks the media is against his team. Fan #2 tends to give a little more leeway to coaches. He is slower to question moves, always falling back on "they're the professionals, they know what's going on, and I trust them."
Fan #2 is more headstrong in his beliefs, his mind doesn't often change, and he tends to have more thoughts that are self reliant. That is not to say he is not ever wrong. His fatal flaw is that he is too reliant on the powers that be, and sometimes the powers that be are wrong.
Our small sample of posters in this forum represent both types of sports fans.
I think there are some gray areas and I think sometimes you may be fan #1 of one team and #2 of another.
But for the most part, I feel like you are one or the other.
What do y'all think?