fischer
honorary peso (chingador*)
Posts: 16,271
|
Post by fischer on Feb 12, 2009 11:28:07 GMT -5
its still a real contract. Its just a legal thing.
You are right, they should just make it the team that they played for the longest.
|
|
|
Post by The River Assassin on Feb 12, 2009 11:30:49 GMT -5
Also, I have not heard anyone on any radio or tv station, in Sports Illustrated or in any newspaper mention Emmitt's cardinal year, or Montana's chiefs years. They don't talk about it. Its not just me. I have no ties with San Francisco so your argument is gone on that as well. Damn I forgot that you can listen to every sports radio show in the nation at the same time while also reading every sports article written that day. Just last year when Farve came back someone wrote an article about the one day contract in ESPN the magazine. Rome also talks about it on his show every now and then. The fact that we are even talking about them right proves that their legacy is slightly tarnished.
|
|
fischer
honorary peso (chingador*)
Posts: 16,271
|
Post by fischer on Feb 12, 2009 11:33:39 GMT -5
no, its tarnished in your eyes. Not most people's eyes.
Mike and Mike had Joe Montana on the other day for at least 5-10 minutes talking about his legacy as the greatest of all time (possibly). Not one word was mentioned about the Kansas City Chiefs. In 5-10 minutes talking solely about his career, it never came up. I think his legacy is just fine.
|
|
|
Post by The River Assassin on Feb 12, 2009 11:38:51 GMT -5
no, its not tarnished in your eyes. It is in most people's eyes.
See, I can make broad general statements that are impossible to prove to.
|
|
|
Post by Ticket Mouse on Feb 12, 2009 12:04:38 GMT -5
Don't undersell JM's time in KC. He did make the Pro Bowl his first year. It was only two years but it was way more eventful than Smith's time in Zona.
|
|
sully
honorary peso (chingador*)
Posts: 13,045
|
Post by sully on Feb 12, 2009 12:17:42 GMT -5
They are all tarnished in my eyes.
|
|
fischer
honorary peso (chingador*)
Posts: 16,271
|
Post by fischer on Feb 12, 2009 13:55:12 GMT -5
finch, I was making a jab at you when I did that. In your FIFY quote you made a broad, sweeping statement that cannot be proven.
|
|
|
Post by The River Assassin on Feb 12, 2009 14:47:26 GMT -5
Sure sure
|
|
fischer
honorary peso (chingador*)
Posts: 16,271
|
Post by fischer on Feb 12, 2009 15:02:57 GMT -5
huh?
|
|