|
|
Post by The River Assassin on Oct 14, 2008 12:28:57 GMT -5
Mike, is that you. I think Stubbs is posting under your account. You sound just like him.
|
|
cowtownmike
honorary peso (chingador*)
I done been thru the scruggles.
Posts: 12,467
|
Post by cowtownmike on Oct 14, 2008 12:30:54 GMT -5
Sorry. I am lashing out from my frustration.
|
|
|
|
Post by The River Assassin on Oct 14, 2008 12:36:10 GMT -5
It's ok, like I said, I am here to help.
|
|
fischer
honorary peso (chingador*)
Posts: 16,271
|
Post by fischer on Oct 14, 2008 12:39:01 GMT -5
How much time? It's been what, 12 years since their last playoff win. I know, but they have only had good drafts very recently. Weak NFC? A divisional foe won the superbowl, beating the team that everyone was saying might be the best in the history of the game. That very team is the team that beat Dallas in the last minutes of a playoff game. Not really a "down year" for the NFC. |
|
|
|
Post by The River Assassin on Oct 14, 2008 12:45:41 GMT -5
You can't argue that the NFC was down last year and that the AFC was much better. A 10-6 Browns team missed the playoffs, while two 9-7 teams made the playoffs from the NFC. And what does the Giants coming together as team have to do with the Cowboys choking once again in the playoffs. That was their game to win, and they made sure to lose it.
|
|
fischer
honorary peso (chingador*)
Posts: 16,271
|
Post by fischer on Oct 14, 2008 12:50:14 GMT -5
Head to head NFC vs AFC was 32-32. You can't judge divisional records because those 9-7 teams played different teams than the Cleveland Browns. There is no way you can say that if the schedules were flipped, that the records wouldn't be different.
Not to mention, there were more teams from the NFC with a winning record vs the AFC then vice versa.
I got this off of a google search, but it was some message board so I don't know how accurate the info is.
On the other hand, The NFC had the Cowboys, the Giants, and the Packers who were all legitimate Super Bowl contenders at the end of the regular season.
The AFC had the Patriots.
|
|
|
|
Post by The River Assassin on Oct 14, 2008 12:58:23 GMT -5
That's right, just the Patriots. Forgot the Colts, the defending champs, or the Steelers, the champs from two years before, or the Chargers, or the Jaguars. Yeah, the AFC only had the Patriots.
|
|
fischer
honorary peso (chingador*)
Posts: 16,271
|
Post by fischer on Oct 14, 2008 12:59:39 GMT -5
No one anywhere picked the Steelers or the Jaguars. I forgot about the Colts.
|
|
|
|
Post by The River Assassin on Oct 14, 2008 13:06:01 GMT -5
No one anywhere picked the Packers or the Giants. The Pack were coming off a 4-12 season and Tom Caughlin (sp?) and Eli where on the hot seat.
|
|
fischer
honorary peso (chingador*)
Posts: 16,271
|
Post by fischer on Oct 14, 2008 13:07:28 GMT -5
I am talking about the end of the regular season.
The Packers were the #2 seed in the NFC and playing well, with a resurgent Brett Favre and the Giants were the hottest team in football, excepting the Patriots.
|
|
|
|
Post by The River Assassin on Oct 14, 2008 13:12:31 GMT -5
I know this works on Stubbs but do you really think it will work on me.
|
|
fischer
honorary peso (chingador*)
Posts: 16,271
|
Post by fischer on Oct 14, 2008 13:13:46 GMT -5
On the other hand, The NFC had the Cowboys, the Giants, and the Packers who were all legitimate Super Bowl contenders at the end of the regular season. The AFC had the Patriots. |
|
|
|
Post by The River Assassin on Oct 14, 2008 13:17:28 GMT -5
I was close, but I didn't write a three page long response filled with references about why I was right. Plus I knew you were bull shitting the whole time.
|
|
cowtownmike
honorary peso (chingador*)
I done been thru the scruggles.
Posts: 12,467
|
Post by cowtownmike on Oct 14, 2008 13:51:10 GMT -5
Pac-man done. 4 game suspension. Time to cut bait and move on.
|
|
|
|
Post by The River Assassin on Oct 14, 2008 14:47:38 GMT -5
Sorry Wade, you had a good run but you are gone.
|
|
