sully
honorary peso (chingador*)
Posts: 13,045
|
Post by sully on Sept 29, 2009 9:33:10 GMT -5
Good win for the defense. Garrett's playcalling is still questionable, and Romo is still an idiot. As long as he doesn't lose games for us, we'll be alright.
|
|
|
|
Post by P. Marf on Sept 29, 2009 11:32:53 GMT -5
He did exactly what you wanted. You can't call him an idiot this week.
|
|
fischer
honorary peso (chingador*)
Posts: 16,271
|
Post by fischer on Sept 29, 2009 12:28:27 GMT -5
he has a point.
Romo made almost no mistakes.
|
|
cowtownmike
honorary peso (chingador*)
I done been thru the scruggles.
Posts: 12,467
|
Post by cowtownmike on Sept 29, 2009 13:50:42 GMT -5
Romo was a caretaker QB last night and it was enough to win the game. C'mon Tony, Just don't screw up! Sorry, but I want/need a little more out of my $60M leader.
|
|
|
|
Post by The River Assassin on Sept 29, 2009 14:01:16 GMT -5
Mike makes a good point
|
|
sully
honorary peso (chingador*)
Posts: 13,045
|
Post by sully on Sept 29, 2009 14:09:23 GMT -5
I'm on board with Mike. This guys needs to give us more than that. Not one deep ball. We should have won by 4 TD's. In an attempt to improve the passing stats, we blew a goal line situation. When asked who the leader of the team was last night, Choice said Witten.
|
|
|
|
Post by P. Marf on Sept 29, 2009 14:53:46 GMT -5
Romo didn't call those two stupid throws. He did what he needed to win the game. I guess if kitna was in we would have won by 30. When you rush for over 200 yards you don't need a deep ball. You just need to be move the ball in the air when needed and not make mistakes. I don't think we would have got an extra half win if we would have won by more anyways.
|
|
|
|
Post by P. Marf on Sept 29, 2009 14:54:32 GMT -5
I think its really a lose lose situation for romo with lots of people.
|
|
cowtownmike
honorary peso (chingador*)
I done been thru the scruggles.
Posts: 12,467
|
Post by cowtownmike on Sept 29, 2009 16:28:39 GMT -5
I want to like Romo. It's not like I have an agenda against him like I do against Houston Nutt.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ticket Mouse on Sept 29, 2009 16:32:44 GMT -5
Just face it...they are just a slightly above average team. Once Cowboy fans realize they are what they are then they'll be satisfied with a 2 TD win last night.
|
|
cowtownmike
honorary peso (chingador*)
I done been thru the scruggles.
Posts: 12,467
|
Post by cowtownmike on Sept 29, 2009 16:51:40 GMT -5
Just face it...they are just a slightly above average team. Once Cowboy fans realize they are what they are then they'll be satisfied with a 2 TD win last night. We will never be satisfied with slightly above average. The New Jersey con man may have sold that concept to the 0-3 fish fans but that attitude doesn't fly here in the great state of Texas. |
|
|
|
Post by Ticket Mouse on Sept 29, 2009 17:04:22 GMT -5
Hey, I know what the Phins are. They suck. They were very fortunate last year. Lots of people were pissed at their playoff lost. I needed a triple bypass to even accept the fact they were in the playoff picure.
|
|
sully
honorary peso (chingador*)
Posts: 13,045
|
Post by sully on Sept 29, 2009 17:05:24 GMT -5
Good point. I can't wait til we get passed the Romo days.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ticket Mouse on Sept 29, 2009 17:09:35 GMT -5
Or past...
|
|
fischer
honorary peso (chingador*)
Posts: 16,271
|
Post by fischer on Sept 29, 2009 19:36:05 GMT -5
I'm on board with Mike. This guys needs to give us more than that. Not one deep ball. We should have won by 4 TD's. In an attempt to improve the passing stats, we blew a goal line situation. When asked who the leader of the team was last night, Choice said Witten. I am not a big Romo fan. But he did what a good qb does last night. he controlled the game. Its fine to be a Romo hater, just don't use last night as an example. All you have to do is point to the fact that we were playing a terrible team. Its the big games Romo can't win. Now, Sully, your reasoning is terrible. The QB doesn't call the plays, and no one is trying to pad his stats. That is just stupid. Then you turn around and gripe about not throwing down the field. As any coach in America does, when you are pounding the ball down the other team's throat, you control the game. That is a good thing. That is what we did last night. Also, when you see him look down field for 3 seconds and then check the ball down to the TE or back, that is a play where a ball could go "down the field" but the receivers were covered. That is on the receivers not the QB. He was doing the smart thing by not forcing the ball. |
|
